These comparative sketches showing a Haast's eagle skull and bill alongside various Old World vulture species and wedge-tailed eagle are worth checking out.
Sketches: https://whanganuiregionalmuseum.files.w ... sketch.jpg
Full blog post: https://whanganuiregionalmuseum.wordpre ... comment-93
What did Haast's eagle look like?
- Michael Szabo
- Posts: 2533
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 12:30 pm
- Contact:
What did Haast's eagle look like?
'Birds New Zealand' Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Birdsnewzealand
-
- Posts: 1871
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Location: Christchurch
Re: What did Haast's eagle look like?
I'm sure Mike Dickison knows quite well the very large model Haast's Eagle on the wall of Canterbury Museum.
And why shouldn't it be called after Haast? The bones came from the S Island and east of the Alps was the bird's range.
And why shouldn't it be called after Haast? The bones came from the S Island and east of the Alps was the bird's range.
- Michael Szabo
- Posts: 2533
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 12:30 pm
- Contact:
Re: What did Haast's eagle look like?
Interestingly this Maori 'rock pictograph' drawn with charcoal on limestone at Craigmore in South Canterbury appears to show a large winged raptor in flight with a relatively white 'vulturine' head and elongated bill contrasting the dark body and wings:
http://www.teara.govt.nz/files/45529-pc.jpg
http://www.teara.govt.nz/files/45529-pc.jpg
'Birds New Zealand' Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Birdsnewzealand
-
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:53 pm
- Location: Wellington
Re: What did Haast's eagle look like?
Jan wrote:I'm sure Mike Dickison knows quite well the very large model Haast's Eagle on the wall of Canterbury Museum.
And why shouldn't it be called after Haast? The bones came from the S Island and east of the Alps was the bird's range.
I think the author was suggesting that Haast named the eagle after himself, which I don't think was the case at all. I haven't read Haast's original paper but I suspect the common name was attached later simply because he was the describer.
I didn't think the article was particularly well written myself.
- Michael Szabo
- Posts: 2533
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 12:30 pm
- Contact:
Re: What did Haast's eagle look like?
I just checked George Watola's account of the naming. He says that Julius von Haast first named it Harpagornis moorei after George Henry Moore, owner of Glenmark Swamp in North Canterbury where the type material was found. So it seems that Julius von Haast did not give it the name "Haast's eagle" and that the name refers to Haast as the person who first described the species.
http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/species/haasts-eagle
http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/species/haasts-eagle
Last edited by Michael Szabo on Fri Feb 27, 2015 8:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
'Birds New Zealand' Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Birdsnewzealand
- Neil Fitzgerald
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3637
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 10:20 am
- Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: What did Haast's eagle look like?
Shouldn't we call it Moore's eagle?
-
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:45 pm
Re: What did Haast's eagle look like?
Haast's eagle could be called all sorts of things but if you keep changing it no one will know what anybody else is talking about.
Haast called the thing (Moore's Eagle in translation more or less), I just looked up Oliver and he called it Greater Extinct Eagle in English but more recently somebody obviously felt Haast's eagle was better and this is how most people know it now.
Ian
Haast called the thing (Moore's Eagle in translation more or less), I just looked up Oliver and he called it Greater Extinct Eagle in English but more recently somebody obviously felt Haast's eagle was better and this is how most people know it now.
Ian
-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:54 pm
Re: What did Haast's eagle look like?
I'm pretty sure that Richard Holdaway came up with the name "Haast's eagle".
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:39 am
Re: What did Haast's eagle look like?
When giving a species an honourific common English name it is convention to either honour the describer i.e. Haast or the person the species honours in the scientific name i.e Moore. There is no rule. If life was fair the species should be named after the true discoverer Fuller who worked for Haast and recognised the bones as being from a giant Eagle.
My five cents: Harpagornis to me seems a perfectly good "English" name. It is no longer the valid scientific name as the species has been shown to nest within Aquila.
Paul
Haast descibed Harpagornis
My five cents: Harpagornis to me seems a perfectly good "English" name. It is no longer the valid scientific name as the species has been shown to nest within Aquila.
Paul
Haast descibed Harpagornis
-
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:45 pm
Re: What did Haast's eagle look like?
I have just been looking at a couple of papers on the relationships of eagles that include Haast's Eagle - https://pgl.soe.ucsc.edu/eagle_bunce05.pdf and http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/article/vie ... a.4216.4.1.
The first is the older paper and includes a picture showing the big difference in the size of the leg bones. The second is about the relationships of eagles redefining the genera and putting Haast's Eagle back into Hieraaetus which differs from the checklist (Aquila) - due to a different conception of how the eagles are related to each other.
Ian
The first is the older paper and includes a picture showing the big difference in the size of the leg bones. The second is about the relationships of eagles redefining the genera and putting Haast's Eagle back into Hieraaetus which differs from the checklist (Aquila) - due to a different conception of how the eagles are related to each other.
Ian