Hi George,
I agree with you regarding using eBird in preference to NatureWatch. I'd sent Kimberley a PM about this earlier in the day, but in light of your message thought it might be useful to re-post on the public thread for others to see. Here goes:
Hi Kimberley,
I've been following progress on the planning of the NZ Big Day Birdathon with great interest, I think it's a great idea!
If you're still looking into options for a system to record observations on the day, I'd strongly advocate you to use eBird in preference to NatureWatch. I've been a keen user of these citizen science databases for a number of years, and have formed the view that eBird is the far superior system for recording citizen science bird observations in NZ.
There are a few reasons for this, namely:
- Observations submitted to eBird have a far greater likelihood of being put to use to inform the conservation of birds and their habitats in NZ, and to carry out new research on trends in the distribution and abundance of birds, so any birder submitting their observations to eBird will therefore also be making more of a contribution towards bird conservation in NZ than if they used NatureWatch. One reason behind this difference is that eBird structures observations into complete checklists, which are far more useful when it comes to mapping bird distribution than simple one-off records are. Another reason is that eBird has much more robust data checking systems chugging away behind the scenes, so is far better at weeding out erroneous observations than NatureWatch is. The flow-on effect from this being that researchers and conservation managers can have far greater confidence in the reliability of eBird data than they can of NatureWatch data.
- Many of the birders likely to participate in the Birdathon are also already habitual eBird users, so by using eBird for the Birdathon, your participants won't have to learn how to use a novel reporting system just for that one day.
- In terms of size, eBird also dwarfs NatureWatch when it comes to the number of citizen science bird records that it holds. eBird currently holds over 750,000 bird observations for New Zealand, whereas NatureWatch contains only a few tens of thousands. So if you'd like your Birdathon participants to add their data to the largest repository of citizen science bird observations in NZ, then eBird is the database to use.
I understand that there might be some technical reasons behind your preference to use NatureWatch (i.e. the availability of open API), however I'd encourage you to weigh this convenience up against what your wider goals of holding a Birdathon are. As well as creating a fun birding event, and engaging a number of birders in the process, the observations that are collected on the day could also be put to great use by conservation agencies if participants were given the opportunity to add them to eBird, rather than NatureWatch. And it would be a real shame if all that effort spent by all of us experienced birders wasn't put to good use...
I'm not at all experienced with website or database design, so I'm afraid I'm no help when it comes to giving you tips on how best to integrate eBird into your Birdathon website. What I do know though is that there is a precedent for eBird to be used for these sorts of events - every year in May eBird runs a "Global Big Day" (essentially a worldwide Birdathon), with tens of thousands of participants from around the world (including a dedicated few from NZ) submitting their Big Day observations via eBird. You can navigate to the following link to have a look at how the global big day eBird page is set up:
http://ebird.org/ebird/globalbigday.
I hope this feedback is of help, and best of luck with planning this event!
Best regards,
Nikki