Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

General birdwatching discussion, help with bird identification, and all other things relating to wild birds and birding in NZ that don't fit in one of the other forums.
User avatar
Mike Bickerdike
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2024 9:33 am
Location: Auckland

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby Mike Bickerdike » Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:01 pm

Difficult to say obviously wrong… but probably wrong: the same two visitors from the US report a Wandering Tattler at Ambury farm, and a Pomarine Skua from the ferry from Auckland. Both seem highly unlikely and are reported with no comment or photos, but of course they now crop up on eBird alerts.
https://ebird.org/checklist/S202941549
https://ebird.org/checklist/S203065440

I guess this is a frequent issue with visitors who don’t realise how unlikely a sighting is?
tom.b
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:53 pm

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby tom.b » Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:03 am

Likely Southern Black-backed Gulls recorded as Great Black-backed Gulls, in Christchurch.


https://ebird.org/checklist/S203326124
User avatar
RussCannings
Posts: 1241
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:23 am

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby RussCannings » Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:19 pm

Mike Bickerdike wrote:Difficult to say obviously wrong… but probably wrong: the same two visitors from the US report a Wandering Tattler at Ambury farm, and a Pomarine Skua from the ferry from Auckland. Both seem highly unlikely and are reported with no comment or photos, but of course they now crop up on eBird alerts.
https://ebird.org/checklist/S202941549
https://ebird.org/checklist/S203065440

I guess this is a frequent issue with visitors who don’t realise how unlikely a sighting is?


Thanks Mike, there was a Pom around there recently so will get someone to look at that. Wandering unlikely yes, perhaps one of the GT Tattlers that summer there (or something else).

Thanks again all for submitting here.
User avatar
Mike Bickerdike
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2024 9:33 am
Location: Auckland

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby Mike Bickerdike » Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:46 am

30 blue duck sitting on a lake, reported by tourist, where none previously recorded...
https://ebird.org/checklist/S203639479
User avatar
Samsperdy
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:26 pm
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby Samsperdy » Fri Dec 06, 2024 4:46 pm

Clearly a joke of some kind.
https://ebird.org/checklist/S204573641
User avatar
Mike Bickerdike
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2024 9:33 am
Location: Auckland

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby Mike Bickerdike » Wed Dec 25, 2024 10:57 am

9 curlew sandpipers at Miranda, spotted by American tourist https://ebird.org/checklist/S206044975
paradoxdinokipi
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2022 8:51 pm
Location: Currently in Australia for university :)

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby paradoxdinokipi » Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:46 am

Aus Shelduck, Terek Sand, PGP and Stints all reported at Mangere by the same person and without any comments!

https://ebird.org/checklist/S206038507
https://ebird.org/checklist/S205965584
my inat: https://www.inaturalist.org/people/4733175 & ebird account is linked in that profile :)
Brendan T
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2024 3:24 pm
Location: Auckland
Contact:

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby Brendan T » Wed Dec 25, 2024 2:05 pm

I followed that up the next day on the very off chance it was correctly reported since I felt like a walk anyway - I couldn't sight any of those birds that were reported.
Aussie birder living in Auckland
User avatar
Nick Allen
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:40 pm

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby Nick Allen » Thu Dec 26, 2024 4:59 pm

Re https://ebird.org/checklist/S206044975 I do like the idea of a heuristic godwit - one that can solve it's own problems by trial and error, though wonder why the observer thought the other 5999 at Miranda were not able to do this. Anyway it's good to know that one individual doesn't just copy what all the other godwits are doing there and can act as a trend-setter.

Nobody seems to have commented on the distance travelled by the submitter for the Radio Mast list https://ebird.org/checklist/S206038507. 2 miles would take the submitter from the radio mast west & northwards along the coastal track to outside the Ambury Park boundaries, or almost to Ihumātao or about half way to the airport. So where did they bird? Shame we can't see the tracks recorded on eBird. I suspect that at least some of the observations were made away from the Radio Mast area, as the area there isn't quite big enough to account for the distance travelled.

I'm not sure why this topic is *Obviously* incorrect reports on eBird. Is anything that is reported re bird occurrence/behaviour *obviously* incorrect? From experience birds are unpredictable at times, and putting observations under this heading is disrespectful to the observers/submitters, who just might be correct. Presumedly or possibly might be a better term than obviously and feel less like a kangaroo court.
paradoxdinokipi
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2022 8:51 pm
Location: Currently in Australia for university :)

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Postby paradoxdinokipi » Fri Dec 27, 2024 7:51 am

I'd wager rather than there being a track it's just someone guesstimating and inputting it on the web browser, which is also probably how they submitted Terek Sandpiper on the list without adding any comments (unless there's a way to get around them on the app version aswell!), I'd also agree that at least the lists that I sent, aren't 'obviously incorrect' as all these species could technically be found at Mangere, I just wanted to put it up for community consensus and hopefully for an eBird reviewer to reach out to the guy about their sightings. :)
my inat: https://www.inaturalist.org/people/4733175 & ebird account is linked in that profile :)

Return to “General Birding Discussion”