Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

General birdwatching discussion, help with bird identification, and all other things relating to wild birds and birding in NZ that don't fit in one of the other forums.
Finn Davey
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2020 9:38 am
Contact:

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by Finn Davey »

This person has put down a Pied x Black stilt hybird, but it looks like a juvenile Black Stilt.
https://ebird.org/checklist/S65449136
Jan
Posts: 1979
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:43 am
Location: Christchurch

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by Jan »

I think it is a hybrid as the white face and vent are often hybrid features in nodes F and G
Finn Davey
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2020 9:38 am
Contact:

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by Finn Davey »

It just looks rather tatty to me, and some feathers appear to be more of a juvenile brown.
User avatar
Tim Barnard
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:30 pm
Location: Okere Falls

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by Tim Barnard »

I think the most important aspect of this thread is that we all flood this fantastic tool with accurate and up to date data. Don’t worry about mistakes just populate it with info. That’s something we should all be doing from novice enthusiasts to mega twitchers... there’s not enough of the latter to be frank. Honest mistakes will get picked up. Just keep the data flowing...
User avatar
RussCannings
Posts: 1260
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:23 am

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by RussCannings »

Thanks all for your input on this thread. I don't always remember or have time to check the comments here but checking back through these various lists, I can see virtually all were picked up by regional ebird reviewers and changed/removed (if appropriate).

I'm sure many of the regular ebird users out there can see that visitors run into a lot of confusing situations, not just in terms of identification but more so when it comes to the numerous possible common names. Hard thing to completely fix but such is life.

Keep on eBirding in the free world ;)
Finn Davey
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2020 9:38 am
Contact:

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by Finn Davey »

This one here clearly has a Little Shag, but has been put down as Little Black Shag.
https://ebird.org/checklist/S43510620
Finn Davey
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2020 9:38 am
Contact:

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by Finn Davey »

This one has a mallard or mallard hybrid with some interesting feather pigments. Maybe either from a domestic breed or some sort of melanin or other pigment mutation.
The user has put it down as grey duck.
https://ebird.org/atlasnz/checklist/S68 ... -230676651

I've already given it a wrong species flag.
User avatar
philbattley
Posts: 671
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:21 pm

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by philbattley »

There is a report of two kiwi here near the edge of the Ruahine Ranges, but they are almost certainly morepork.

https://ebird.org/checklist/S42830534

Cheers, Phil
JFDillon
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 10:12 pm
Location: Cambridge, Waikato
Contact:

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by JFDillon »

One thing that always annoys me is reports of Brown Kiwi around Wellington- which obviously there aren't. One on Te Ahumairangi, one at Wellington Zoo, 6 at Zealandia spread throughout two hotspots and two random locations. The Te Ahumairangi and Wellington Zoo ones are obviously unfounded. The others are of course Little Spotted Kiwi.
JFDillon
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 10:12 pm
Location: Cambridge, Waikato
Contact:

Re: Obviously incorrect reports on eBird

Post by JFDillon »

https://ebird.org/checklist/S62529040 Also this checklist of a bunch of seabirds in the Botans. I guess they selected the wrong location??
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic